Background Check




BACKGROUND SEARCH
BACKGROUND CHECK

Utah Conducts Criminal Background Checks on Evacuees

Utah Conducts Criminal Background Checks on EvacueesSaturday :: September 10, 2005
Utah Conducts Criminal Background Checks on Evacuees
Once again, those with a criminal history are treated like second class citizens. Utah is conducting criminal background checks on evacuees.

No one has been expelled yet, and Utah says the evacuees have been exemplary in their conduct. Still, this is troubling.

Update: As Mike Ditto points out in comments below, Colorado also is doing background checks. But I'll give them a bit of a pass for this statment:

The community does not have to be concerned, said Chief Jones. We think people are safe because all of these evacuees have served their sentences.

Posted Saturday :: September 10, 2005| Katrina


Comments


Posted by Michael Ditto at September 10, 2005 07:02 PM
Colorado too.

Posted by Aaron at September 10, 2005 07:15 PM
Exactly what grounds does the state of Utah have for conducting background checks on people who are accused of no crime and are applying for no job?

What happens if one of these evacuees (US citizens) refuses to identify themselves or cooperate, what will the consequences be?

Posted by aw at September 10, 2005 08:37 PM
What happens if one of these evacuees (US citizens) refuses to identify themselves or cooperate, what will the consequences be?
That's a very interesting question.

Posted by cpinva at September 10, 2005 09:01 PM
i was pondering that very question myself. the last time i checked, LA is part of these here new nited states, these aren't immigrants from a foreign land. what business does any state have conducting a criminal background check on any other citizen coming in from another state?

is it possible i missed some critical fact that would explain the legality of this?

Posted by Lavocat at September 10, 2005 10:15 PM
Simply refuse to comply. There is no legal obligation to comply UNLESS a violation of the public order is suspected to have been committed. Even then, all you have to do is give your legal name and address and refuse to answer ANY further questions.

I think the Constitution still applies, Katrina or no.

Posted by Michael Ditto at September 11, 2005 02:17 AM
Lavocat, they ran the background checks without permission. The article quoted the cops saying that they don't need permission, that it's just like making a traffic stop.

Except that people who get stopped in traffic (presumably) just got caught doing something wrong. So maybe the cops need to check their reasoning.

Posted by pigwiggle at September 11, 2005 08:21 AM
Can’t I simply pay someone to do a background check on any of you, that is, legally?

Posted by Aaron at September 11, 2005 12:47 PM
pigwiggle

Sure you can do a background check on any one you like, and if you've taken some basic investigative journalism classes you can find out a lot more about someone than you might imagine.

But of course to do any kind of checks you need a name and a Social Security number. So if these evacuees refuse to give any information or give inaccurate or intentionally misleading information, what recourse do state officials have in that instance?

Last time I checked this is still America where no one can compel you to provide any information unless you've been accused of some kind of crime.

So since constitutionally, law enforcement officials cannot legally detain you or arrest a US citizen under these circumstances, perhaps you'll find yourself designated a detainee and be sent to Guantanamo Bay under the auspices of the patriot act, which is not out of the realm of possibility.


All they would have to do is classify you as a possible terrorist threat, and without any ID to prove you are a US citizen, off you go down to the Caribbean to be force-fed cafe Cubanos through a nasogastric tube with all the other hunger strikers.


Posted by glanton at September 11, 2005 12:53 PM
What I'm hearing, which is sort of scary, is they all want to stay in Utah.

Blech.

Posted by pigwiggle at September 11, 2005 02:04 PM
glanton-

I live in Salt Lake, and as lame as living with a bunch of Mormons can be, they are extremely friendly and generous folks. Set aside the expensive booze, etc. and you have a clean beautiful city with relatively little crime. Folks here don’t really have a lot of money, but they give a great deal; I believe more than almost every state. The Mormon’s literally have warehouses full of basic needs packages that they ship to impoverished nations daily (accept Sunday of course). The Church regularly arranges for refugees to come to the city; I wouldn’t be surprised if the majority of black folks here are foreign nationals. This is a perfect place for refugees, US citizens or not.


Posted by glanton at September 11, 2005 05:01 PM
pigwiggle:

I think you misunderstood my post; while I loathe Utah's overall politics I have no doubt that its communities have done right by the refugees, and will continue to do so.

My original post was simply intended to speculate what the results wouold be if everyone thought like Barbara Bush, whose direct quote I presented.

Also, in case you didn't see it, I did respond to your thoughts on greed posted in the other thread.

Cheers

Posted by pigwiggle at September 11, 2005 05:29 PM
Oh ... I see; went right over my head.

Post a comment
HTML Tags:
bBold/b = Bold
iItalics/i = Italics
a href=http://www.url.comlinked text/a = Linked text

Please Only Click The Post Button One Time.
URLs Within Comment Body Not In HTML Format Will be Deleted.

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)


URL (optional):


Remember me? YesNo


Comments:





You are not signed in. You need to be registered to comment on this site. Sign in

Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news


TalkLeft

Home
About TalkLeft
E-Mail Us
Tip Jar



Premium Blog Ad


Available Now
Limited to two ads



Blog Ad Networks




Advertise on Liberal Blogs



Advertise on Legal Blogs


Feeds and XML


XML
RSS 1.0
Atom
Syndicate this site



Search


Contribute To TalkLeft

Thanks for Contributing PayPal
Amazon

Shop
Amazon - For You



Category Archives


Blog Related
Booker-Blakely
Civil Liberties
Clinton-Pirro
Constitution
Court Decisions
Crime Policy
Crimes in the News
Death Penalty
Democratic Convention 2004
Detainees
Elections
Elections 2006
Elections 2008
Foreign Affairs
Inmates and Prisons
Innocence Cases
John Roberts
Judiciary
Juvenile Offenders
Katrina
Kobe Case
Law Related
Legislation
Media
Military Draft
Misconduct
Off Topic
Oklahoma City Bombing
Politics - Other
Republican Convention
Social Injustice
Supreme Court
Terror Trials
Valerie Plame Leak
War in Iraq
War on Terror



E-Mail and Comment Policy


All e-mail received by TalkLeft is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please don't send attachments.

TalkLeft reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments.

URL's within the body of the comment must be in html format or they will be deleted as they skew the site. Instructions are in the comment box.

Full Comment Policy



Legal


All Content Copyright 2002-2005. Reprints only by permission from TalkLeft.com.

Nothing on this site should be construed as legal advice. TalkLeft does not give legal advice.

TalkLeft is not responsible for and often disagrees with material posted in the comments section. Read at your own risk.



Powered by
Movable Type 3.16

Who Are You Dealing With? Client Background Check Essentials


BACKGROUND CHECK

-
Email: h@g.vbv

Built using ecBuilder.

 

 

Net Detective  Detective Info  Background Record  DVD Software Criminal Record